External Independent Technical Review

While provisions calling for the independent technical review ("ITR") of certain government projects and programs have been in place for years at numerous federal agencies, there has been a distinct increase in emphasis on the ITR in recent times. The acronym, "ITR", can mean different things to different agencies. Some agencies view an ITR primarily as an independent check on the stated cost and schedule of a project or a program ("program"). Other agencies focus on the word "technical" and look to the ITR to primarily address the likelihood that the project will meet its technical goals. Still others combine both of these as primary objectives of the agency's ITR program. To further confuse and diminish clarity, a new acronym has entered the government lexicon. The "EITR" announces the external independent technical review. In some agencies, an ITR is considered "independent" when undertaken by agency personnel as long as those personnel had no part in the development of the program. An ITR of a controversial program undertaken by employees of the proposing agency often lacks the necessary credibility to sustain that program when it comes under public scrutiny. Hence, the addition of the word "external" to the description of the review. An EITR usually describes a re - view performed by a team whose members are not in the employ of the agency proposing the program. Often EITR teams consist of non-government experts assembled and contracted to conduct the required review.

Legis Consultancy has undertaken multiple ITRs for the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. One such ITR was required to support the Corp's request to Congress for funding in the amount of $15 Billion for the Hurricane Protection System in New Orleans.